A hot international shipment will lose its sizzle if it's held up by missing paperwork or a customs mixup. Here's how shippers and carriers are keeping those pricey shipments from losing velocity.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
It could be a valuable piece of electronics. Or something perishable, like a crate of truffles. Or an item with a short shelf life, such as a designer dress. International express shipping is pricey, and so shippers are likely to make use of it only when, to borrow from an old ad slogan, it absolutely, positively has to be there right away.
Though international express shipments represent but a small portion of all international shipments, the express segment is one of the faster-growing businesses for international carriers. Last year, more than 2 million international express shipments rocketed around the world every day, according to the Air Cargo Management Group, a Seattle-based consulting and research organization.
That trend has been building for some time now. In its biennial World Air Cargo Forecast, last published in 2004, Boeing Inc. reported that international express shipping had averaged 16.4-percent annual growth during the previous decade. The pace may slacken in the coming years, but the express segment will keep on growing, buoyed by an ever-rising volume of goods and materials sourced or produced overseas. "As businesses continue to expand beyond domestic or close regional markets," the Boeing forecast noted, "the international express sector will continue to grow, albeit at more sustainable long-term rates."
No more tangles
As sourcing becomes more international in scope, it's imperative that shippers keep their hot shipments from getting snarled somewhere in the supply chain. International express shipping carries some risks that don't affect domestic shipments. They include issues arising from language, cultural and currency differences. They include holdups that occur when shippers run afoul of documentation and regulatory requirements that vary substantially from country to country. And they include delays arising from scrutiny by foreign or domestic customs officials for reasons of both compliance and security.
Given the risks, it's small wonder that shippers are eager for any assistance they can get. And it's easy to see the appeal of using a carrier that can streamline the process. In fact, Jon Routledge, vice president for international sales at DHL, believes DHL's ability to take command of the full process is largely responsible for its success. "We provide as much connectivity and DHL control end to end as possible," he says. "As we've expanded the network, a couple of things have been constant throughout. We've maintained maximum control in order to give peace of mind with security and visibility."
Routledge notes that U.S.-based shippers typically want more from their carriers than just transportation. "There is a heavy reliance on the carrier not just to expedite the movement from point A to point B, but to steer through the regulatory and cultural barriers," he says. "There's an expectation by the customer that sourcing should be as easy in Asia as it is in North America.We attempt to make that a reality." The goal, he says, is to become an extension of the customer's company overseas.
Play by the rules
It's important to note that in the end, it's the customer who bears final responsibility for its international shipments. Ultimately, shippers are accountable for complying with the dizzying array of rules and regulations. But they're not entirely on their own. The express carriers, along with customs brokers, forwarders, and other international specialists, stand ready to help.
"Customers are concerned with two things," says Ken Grace, director of gateway services for DHL. "They want speed and visibility and they want compliance. We work a great deal with importers to ensure accuracy and proper documentation. Preparation is critical." He notes that imports have come under increased scrutiny by Customs officials since 9/11, making accuracy and regulatory compliance more crucial than ever.
One key to seamless service is taking the time to set up a new customer's first shipment properly, says Jerry Del Gaudio, vice president of international trade services for UPS Supply Chain Solutions. Del Gaudio explains that companies that are frequent users of international express service tend to ship mainly between the same origin and destination points, so the information gathered up front will cover most subsequent shipments. "We get lots of information on lanes and commodities," he says. Capturing information early allows the carrier to ensure that arrangements for such things as licenses or powers of attorney are in place before the shipment begins its journey. "Then we set it up electronically," he adds. "A lot of it is set up in EDI before the time of pickup. We can alert the destination 12 to 24 hours in advance."
Systems for hire
Not surprisingly, the major international express carriers have invested heavily in technology designed to make transport seamless. They've spared no expense setting up both internal systems and networks that link them with outside parties—customers or government agencies, for example—to keep shipments from getting held up along the way.
"When you start thinking about how to maintain speed—and to balance that speed with accuracy, security and compliance—a lot of that drives off investments in technology," says Del Gaudio. "Without these, we could not be as efficient. Information has to move more quickly than the merchandise so we can efficiently handle regulatory and customs issues."
Shippers without EDI can use other electronic tools offered by the major carriers. And for those customers who have yet to automate their operations (a very small percentage of international shippers, according to Del Gaudio), the carriers can capture data from fax or paper documents. "We have a lot of shipping systems for the unsophisticated end user," he says. "They can buy the software, or, for those who don't have any [systems in place], we can enter the information."
DHL has developed a number of online tools to help U.S. companies navigate the complexities of international shipping and to provide tracing and tracking. It will soon launch a new Internet tool called Import Express Online.
FedEx Express likewise offers online help to customers. In March, FedEx Express announced that it had enhanced its FedEx Global Trade Manager, an online tool for small and mid-sized companies, to give customers access to customs documents and regulatory advisories for more than 200 countries. The upgrade also gave clients access to an expanded International Denied Party Screening tool, which is crucial to complying with security requirements.
In fact, it's hard to imagine a discipline where it's more critical to stay up to date with the regulations than international shipping. Conceivably, last week's perfectly legal shipment could get held up this week because of a change in regulation either here or at the source. For that reason, each of the carriers has tools to keep its systems up to date.
Del Gaudio reports that UPS remains in frequent contact with government agencies to ensure that it's notified of any changes. "We do a lot of work with Customs, the Food and Drug Administration, [and] Fish and Wildlife to make sure we're compliant," he says.
Actually, all of the major carriers do much more than simply stay in touch with those agencies. They've also taken an active role in the process of developing and changing regulations. For example, carriers have been tireless in their efforts to simplify the global trade process, endlessly urging governments to develop standardized regulations and to open borders. Should they succeed, of course, they stand to see a big payoff in the form of increased business. "The more you standardize," Del Gaudio points out, "the more you can facilitate trade."
Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled
Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.
The author of this annual study is researcher and consultant Michael Sadowski. He wrote the first report in 2021 as well as the latest edition, which was released earlier this year. Sadowski, who is also executive director of the environmental nonprofit
The Circulate Initiative, recently joined DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the “Logistics Matters” podcast to discuss the key findings of the research, what companies are doing to reduce emissions, and the progress they’ve made since the first report was issued.
A: While companies in the apparel industry can set their own sustainability targets, we realized there was a need to give them a blueprint for actually reducing emissions. And so, we produced the first report back in 2021, where we laid out the emissions from the sector, based on the best estimates [we could make using] data from various sources. It gives companies and the sector a blueprint for what we collectively need to do to drive toward the ambitious reduction [target] of staying within a 1.5 degrees Celsius pathway. That was the first report, and then we committed to refresh the analysis on an annual basis. The second report was published last year, and the third report came out in May of this year.
Q: What were some of the key findings of your research?
A: We found that about half of the emissions in the sector come from Tier Two, which is essentially textile production. That includes the knitting, weaving, dyeing, and finishing of fabric, which together account for over half of the total emissions. That was a really important finding, and it allows us to focus our attention on the interventions that can drive those emissions down.
Raw material production accounts for another quarter of emissions. That includes cotton farming, extracting gas and oil from the ground to make synthetics, and things like that. So we now have a really keen understanding of the source of our industry’s emissions.
Q: Your report mentions that the apparel industry is responsible for about 2% of global emissions. Is that an accurate statistic?
A: That’s our best estimate of the total emissions [generated by] the apparel sector. Some other reports on the industry have apparel at up to 8% of global emissions. And there is a commonly misquoted number in the media that it’s 10%. From my perspective, I think the best estimate is somewhere under 2%.
We know that globally, humankind needs to reduce emissions by roughly half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to hit international goals. [Reaching that target will require the involvement of] every facet of the global economy and every aspect of the apparel sector—transportation, material production, manufacturing, cotton farming. Through our work and that of others, I think the apparel sector understands what has to happen. We have highlighted examples of how companies are taking action to reduce emissions in the roadmap reports.
Q: What are some of those actions the industry can take to reduce emissions?
A: I think one of the positive developments since we wrote the first report is that we’re seeing companies really focus on the most impactful areas. We see companies diving deep on thermal energy, for example. With respect to Tier Two, we [focus] a lot of attention on things like ocean freight versus air. There’s a rule of thumb I’ve heard that indicates air freight is about 10 times the cost [of ocean] and also produces 10 times more greenhouse gas emissions.
There is money available to invest in sustainability efforts. It’s really exciting to see the funding that’s coming through for AI [artificial intelligence] and to see that individual companies, such as H&M and Lululemon, are investing in real solutions in their supply chains. I think a lot of concrete actions are being taken.
And yet we know that reducing emissions by half on an absolute basis by 2030 is a monumental undertaking. So I don’t want to be overly optimistic, because I think we have a lot of work to do. But I do think we’ve got some amazing progress happening.
Q: You mentioned several companies that are starting to address their emissions. Is that a result of their being more aware of the emissions they generate? Have you seen progress made since the first report came out in 2021?
A: Yes. When we published the first roadmap back in 2021, our statistics showed that only about 12 companies had met the criteria [for setting] science-based targets. In 2024, the number of apparel, textile, and footwear companies that have set targets or have commitments to set targets is close to 500. It’s an enormous increase. I think they see the urgency more than other sectors do.
We have companies that have been working at sustainability for quite a long time. I think the apparel sector has developed a keen understanding of the impacts of climate change. You can see the impacts of flooding, drought, heat, and other things happening in places like Bangladesh and Pakistan and India. If you’re a brand or a manufacturer and you have operations and supply chains in these places, I think you understand what the future will look like if we don’t significantly reduce emissions.
Q: There are different categories of emission levels, depending on the role within the supply chain. Scope 1 are “direct” emissions under the reporting company’s control. For apparel, this might be the production of raw materials or the manufacturing of the finished product. Scope 2 covers “indirect” emissions from purchased energy, such as electricity used in these processes. Scope 3 emissions are harder to track, as they include emissions from supply chain partners both upstream and downstream.
Now companies are finding there are legislative efforts around the world that could soon require them to track and report on all these emissions, including emissions produced by their partners’ supply chains. Does this mean that companies now need to be more aware of not only what greenhouse gas emissions they produce, but also what their partners produce?
A: That’s right. Just to put this into context, if you’re a brand like an Adidas or a Gap, you still have to consider the Scope 3 emissions. In particular, there are the so-called “purchased goods and services,” which refers to all of the embedded emissions in your products, from farming cotton to knitting yarn to making fabric. Those “purchased goods and services” generally account for well above 80% of the total emissions associated with a product. It’s by far the most significant portion of your emissions.
Leading companies have begun measuring and taking action on Scope 3 emissions because of regulatory developments in Europe and, to some extent now, in California. I do think this is just a further tailwind for the work that the industry is doing.
I also think it will definitely ratchet up the quality requirements of Scope 3 data, which is not yet where we’d all like it to be. Companies are working to improve that data, but I think the regulatory push will make the quality side increasingly important.
Q: Overall, do you think the work being done by the Apparel Impact Institute will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the industry?
A: When we started this back in 2020, we were at a place where companies were setting targets and knew their intended destination, but what they needed was a blueprint for how to get there. And so, the roadmap [provided] this blueprint and identified six key things that the sector needed to do—from using more sustainable materials to deploying renewable electricity in the supply chain.
Decarbonizing any sector, whether it’s transportation, chemicals, or automotive, requires investment. The Apparel Impact Institute is bringing collective investment, which is so critical. I’m really optimistic about what they’re doing. They have taken a data-driven, evidence-based approach, so they know where the emissions are and they know what the needed interventions are. And they’ve got the industry behind them in doing that.
The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.
Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.
The second reason for higher rates was an ocean-to-air shift in freight volumes due to Red Sea disruptions and e-commerce demand.
Those factors could soon be amplified as e-commerce shows continued strong growth approaching the hotly anticipated winter peak season. E-commerce and low-value goods exports from China in the first seven months of 2024 increased 30% year-on-year, including shipments to Europe and the US rising 38% and 30% growth respectively, Xeneta said.
“Typically, air cargo market performance in August tends to follow the July trend. But another month of double-digit demand growth and the strongest rate growths of the year means there was definitely no summer slack season in 2024,” Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta’s chief airfreight officer, said in a release.
“Rates we saw bottoming out in late July started picking up again in mid-August. This is too short a period to call a season. This has been a busy summer, and now we’re at the threshold of Q4, it will be interesting to see what will happen and if all the anticipation of a red-hot peak season materializes,” van de Wouw said.
The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.
That information comes from the “2024 Labor Day Report” released by Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), the firm’s government relations and public policy arm.
“We continue to see a labor shortage and an urgent need to upskill the current workforce to adapt to the new world of work,” said Michael Lotito, Littler shareholder and co-chair of WPI. “As corporate executives and business leaders look to the future, they are focused on realizing the many benefits of AI to streamline operations and guide strategic decision-making, while cultivating a talent pipeline that can support this growth.”
But while the need is clear, solutions may be complicated by public policy changes such as the upcoming U.S. general election and the proliferation of employment-related legislation at the state and local levels amid Congressional gridlock.
“We are heading into a contentious election that has already proven to be unpredictable and is poised to create even more uncertainty for employers, no matter the outcome,” Shannon Meade, WPI’s executive director, said in a release. “At the same time, the growing patchwork of state and local requirements across the U.S. is exacerbating compliance challenges for companies. That, coupled with looming changes following several Supreme Court decisions that have the potential to upend rulemaking, gives C-suite executives much to contend with in planning their workforce-related strategies.”
Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.
Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.
Stax has rapidly grown since its launch in the first quarter of this year, supported in part by a $40 million funding round from investors, announced in July. It now holds exclusive service agreements at California ports including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Hueneme, Benicia, Richmond, and Oakland. The firm has also partnered with individual companies like NYK Line, Hyundai GLOVIS, Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US (Shell), and now Toyota.
Stax says it offers an alternative to shore power with land- and barge-based, mobile emissions capture and control technology for shipping terminal and fleet operators without the need for retrofits.
In the case of this latest deal, the Toyota Long Beach Vehicle Distribution Center imports about 200,000 vehicles each year on ro-ro vessels. Stax will keep those ships green with its flexible exhaust capture system, which attaches to all vessel classes without modification to remove 99% of emitted particulate matter (PM) and 95% of emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Over the lifetime of this new agreement with Toyota, Stax estimated the service will account for approximately 3,700 hours and more than 47 tons of emissions controlled.
“We set out to provide an emissions capture and control solution that was reliable, easily accessible, and cost-effective. As we begin to service Toyota, we’re confident that we can meet the needs of the full breadth of the maritime industry, furthering our impact on the local air quality, public health, and environment,” Mike Walker, CEO of Stax, said in a release. “Continuing to establish strong partnerships will help build momentum for and trust in our technology as we expand beyond the state of California.”
That result showed that driver wages across the industry continue to increase post-pandemic, despite a challenging freight market for motor carriers. The data comes from ATA’s “Driver Compensation Study,” which asked 120 fleets, more than 150,000 employee drivers, and 14,000 independent contractors about their wage and benefit information.
Drilling into specific categories, linehaul less-than-truckload (LTL) drivers earned a median annual amount of $94,525 in 2023, while local LTL drivers earned a median of $80,680. The median annual compensation for drivers at private carriers has risen 12% since 2021, reaching $95,114 in 2023. And leased-on independent contractors for truckload carriers were paid an annual median amount of $186,016 in 2023.
The results also showed how the demographics of the industry are changing, as carriers offered smaller referral and fewer sign-on bonuses for new drivers in 2023 compared to 2021 but more frequently offered tenure bonuses to their current drivers and with a greater median value.
"While our last study, conducted in 2021, illustrated how drivers benefitted from the strongest freight environment in a generation, this latest report shows professional drivers' earnings are still rising—even in a weaker freight economy," ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said in a release. "By offering greater tenure bonuses to their current driver force, many fleets appear to be shifting their workforce priorities from recruitment to retention."