July 30, 2014

Basing inventory plans on national averages for apparel sizes leads to warehouse inefficiencies

Retailers' failure to account for geographic variations in demand can create operational headaches, says Stitch Labs CEO Brandon Levey.

By Toby Gooley

When it comes to inventory planning, retailers face special challenges. It's hard for them to predict what consumers will want to buy and when. In the case of apparel, many retailers make inventory decisions based in part on national averages for apparel sizing. But that approach can lead to significant miscalculations in inventory production as well as warehouse operational inefficiencies, according to Brandon Levey, CEO of Stitch Labs, a provider of multichannel inventory management and control software for small and medium-sized businesses.

Apparel sizing can vary significantly depending on local and regional markets. To find out just how much variation there is, Stitch Labs analyzed apparel sales from tens of thousands of retailers across the United States. Among the findings:

  • Consumers in Western states purchase almost double the percentage of extra-small (XS) apparel compared with the rest of the country.
  • Consumers in South Dakota, Nebraska, and Iowa purchase the highest percentage of extra-large (XL) and 2XL apparel.
  • Texas consumers buy five times as much XL apparel as XS sizes.
  • Connecticut's sizing breakdown most closely resembles the U.S. average.

How might such geographic variations affect warehouses and distribution centers? Retailers that rely on national size averages risk allocating inventory to warehouses in regions where those sizes are less likely to sell. As a result, Levey said in an interview, "you anticipated selling, say, 25,000 of an item, but because the size breakdowns were incorrect, you have 5,000 left on the books at the end of the year. So now you have inventory you can't move taking up space you need for something else." Furthermore, he added, you'll have to pay for the labor to handle those leftover boxes again.

There are other, costly consequences of making inventory decisions based on average sizes. Apparel sizing affects case size and weight, so stocking the wrong size mix can lead to inefficient slotting, palletizing, and truck loading. Retailers could also end up making more merchandise transfers among warehouses in different regions.

About the Author

Toby Gooley
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.

More articles by Toby Gooley

Strategy Videos

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in, you will be asked to log in or register.

Subscribe to DC Velocity

Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear from you. DC VELOCITY is committed to accuracy and clarity in the delivery of important and useful logistics and supply chain news and information. If you find anything in DC VELOCITY you feel is inaccurate or warrants further explanation, please ?Subject=Feedback - : Basing inventory plans on national averages for apparel sizes leads to warehouse inefficiencies">contact Chief Editor David Maloney. All comments are eligible for publication in the letters section of DC VELOCITY magazine. Please include you name and the name of the company or organization your work for.