Teamster locals to present two-year contract proposal to ABF
Union dissident groups says carrier will likely reject proffer.
Teamster union locals representing 7,500 employees of ABF Freight Systems voted late last week to approve a two-year contract proposal that will be presented to the carrier when negotiations begin Dec. 18.
The proposed two-year duration, agreed to Nov. 29 at a meeting in Kansas City, is designed to coincide with the 2015 expiration date of the Teamsters contract with YRC Worldwide Inc., ABF's chief unionized rival. The language is likely to be rejected by the company, which will demand a lengthier contract period, according to a note from the Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), a dissident group that often clashes with union leadership, notably General President James P. Hoffa.
The proposal calls for a $1 per hour wage increase, per employee, during each of the next two years. ABF is also likely to reject that provision and will instead seek language asking for little or no wage hikes, TDU said.
In addition, the union has requested its pension, health, and welfare benefits be maintained at current levels. That is likely to be rejected as well, TDU said.
The current five-year compact expires March 31, but ABF would like a deal reached well before then.
Executives at ABF, a unit of Fort Smith, Ark.-based Arkansas Best Corp., have declined all comment on issues relating to the contract talks. Teamster officials have not replied to several requests for comment.
Meanwhile, TDU has reported that an agreement was reached in August between ABF and the Teamsters that would be tantamount to a contract concession for about 1,000 employees in 13 western states.
According to the group, ABF was contractually required on Aug. 1 to increase by $1 per hour, per employee, the union's combined pension and health and welfare benefits. Of the total amount, employees in the western states were to receive an additional 65 cents an hour for pension benefits and the remainder was to be allocated to health and welfare benefits.
Instead, the funds earmarked for pensions have been placed in an escrow account with the issue of the allocation to be settled in the contract talks, TDU said.
TDU said in a late November note that the rank-and-file did not vote on the language and that many were unaware of it until the group circulated the note on the eve of the Kansas City meeting.
Ken Paff, national organizer for the TDU, said any contractual language can't be modified while the contract is in force without a vote in the rank-and-file. Paff said, however, that because the funds are in an escrow account and not being spent elsewhere, labor would not have a strong legal case.
About the Author
Executive Editor - News
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
More articles by Mark B. Solomon
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in, you will be asked to log in or register.
Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear from you. DC VELOCITY is committed to accuracy and clarity in the delivery of important and useful logistics and supply chain news and information. If you find anything in DC VELOCITY you feel is inaccurate or warrants further explanation, please ?Subject=Feedback - : Teamster locals to present two-year contract proposal to ABF">contact Chief Editor David Maloney. All comments are eligible for publication in the letters section of DC VELOCITY magazine. Please include you name and the name of the company or organization your work for.