GOP weighing expanded energy development to fund infrastructure programs
Fees, royalties, and taxes could flow to Highway Trust Fund, top lawyer says.
House Republicans are considering opening up federal lands and offshore locations to expanded oil and gas development as a way to generate revenue to fund infrastructure improvements, a leading transportation attorney said last week.
James H. Burnley IV, a prominent lawyer and lobbyist who served as transportation secretary during the last two years of the Reagan administration, told the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' Annual Global Conference in Philadelphia that expanded energy drilling and development activities would generate fees, royalties, and increased tax revenues that could be dedicated to the Highway Trust Fund, the program used to finance infrastructure programs.
In an e-mail to DC Velocity prior to the conference, Burnley acknowledged that the proposal would be "controversial." He added, however, that it "is the first new idea in quite a while" designed to generate new revenue to pay for road and bridge improvements.
Such a plan would likely come under attack from environmentalists as well as from those who believe no one industry should be singled out as a revenue source for highway programs. Last year, President Obama proposed to pay for infrastructure improvements by stripping the U.S. oil and gas industry of two popular tax breaks. The proposal went nowhere.
The latest proposal comes as House and Senate lawmakers wrangle over legislation that would reauthorize funding for the nation's highway programs. Rep. John L. Mica (R-Fla.), chair of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, has proposed a six-year, $238 billion reauthorization whose funding would not exceed revenues that come into the Highway Trust Fund, which is financed from excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel. The Senate has proposed a two-year, $109 billion reauthorization that would keep funding mostly at current levels.
Opponents of the House proposal say the funding levels don't come close to meeting the nation's daunting infrastructure needs and will slash the number of highway projects and cost thousands of jobs. Opponents of the Senate proposal say its proposed funding levels will add to the nation's budget deficit and are not of a long enough duration to allow states and localities to do long-range planning.
Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) has become a sudden force in the process, directing Rep. Mica to find $15 billion in additional annual revenue to be earmarked for the Trust Fund. Burnley, a long-time skeptic of the reauthorization process, told DC Velocity that Speaker Boehner's interest "may make a difference" in moving the process forward.
On Sept. 30, Congress passed a six-month extension to reauthorize the Trust Fund, the eighth short-term extension in two years. At the time, Rep. Mica vowed that this latest extension would be the last.More articles by Mark B. Solomon
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in, you will be asked to log in or register.
- Stakes raised in driver classification debate as New York state law takes effect
- Amazon plans revamp of U.S. shipping with mix of private fleet, regional carriers, USPS
- Hang together or hang separately?
- Michigan-based firm buys "Cold Train" perishables intermodal service
- Africa: Land of odd express deliveries
Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear from you. DC VELOCITY is committed to accuracy and clarity in the delivery of important and useful logistics and supply chain news and information. If you find anything in DC VELOCITY you feel is inaccurate or warrants further explanation, please ?Subject=Feedback - : GOP weighing expanded energy development to fund infrastructure programs">contact Editorial Director Peter Bradley. All comments are eligible for publication in the letters section of DC VELOCITY magazine. Please include you name and the name of the company or organization your work for.