November 23, 2009

ABF, Teamsters may—or may not—be in concession talks

ABF Freight System says it's been discussing wage cuts with the Teamsters. The union says otherwise.

By Mark B. Solomon

To hear less-than-truckload carrier ABF Freight System tell it, the carrier and the Teamsters union are discussing a proposal aimed at wringing wage concessions and pension payment deferrals out of ABF's unionized employees.

To hear the Teamsters tell it, nothing of the sort is taking place.

The disagreement took root on Nov. 17 at the annual TransComp Exhibition and Intermodal Expo in Anaheim, Calif., when ABF Chief Operating Officer Wesley Kemp reportedly said the company was in concession talks with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT). ABF was seeking wage cuts totaling 15 percent through the four remaining years of its collective-bargaining agreement with the union as well as an 18-month deferral of pension payments, he said.

These are demands already agreed to by Teamster members employed at ABF rival YRC Worldwide Inc. But ABF's offer comes with different terms. While YRC workers are receiving options on the company's stock that could be exercised at a pre-set price, ABF has proposed that employees participate in a profit-sharing plan in return for agreeing to the concessions.

The next day, the Teamsters issued a statement saying the union is holding no talks or discussions with ABF. National Freight Director Tyson Johnson said in the statement that the union is "not having contract or concession discussions" with ABF, and that he has contacted ABF to "demand that they correct the record."

The day after that, ABF spokesman Danny Loe issued a statement saying there is "obviously a difference of opinion as to how one would characterize the communication that's taken place between ABF and the IBT concerning wage concessions. That being the case, it's likely best not to debate those semantics in a public forum."

A source close to ABF said the company, worried about the prospect of YRC's gaining a significant cost advantage from the wage givebacks and pension deferrals, could wait no longer to make similar demands of its Teamster employees. The source confirmed that a proposal was presented to the Teamsters and surmised the union's public rebuke was based on the use of words like "talks" and "negotiations" that imply a more formal negotiating process is under way.

"It's more a matter of semantics than anything else," the source said.

More articles by Mark B. Solomon

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in, you will be asked to log in or register.

Comments powered by Disqus

Resources Mentioned In This Article


Subscribe to DC Velocity


Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear from you. DC VELOCITY is committed to accuracy and clarity in the delivery of important and useful logistics and supply chain news and information. If you find anything in DC VELOCITY you feel is inaccurate or warrants further explanation, please ?Subject=Feedback - : ABF, Teamsters may—or may not—be in concession talks">contact Editorial Director Peter Bradley. All comments are eligible for publication in the letters section of DC VELOCITY magazine. Please include you name and the name of the company or organization your work for.

DCV iPhone App






DCV e-newsletters






Go Figure