Simplicity beats complexity in managing inventory
Mergers and acquisitions may be good for growth, but they can create headaches for a company's inventory and delivery performance.
By Toby Gooley
Mergers and acquisitions may be good for growth, but they can create headaches for a company's inventory and delivery performance. This was the case for Johnson Controls, according to a presentation at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals Annual Global Conference by Michael Maltz, the company's Director of Global Manufacturing and Logistics for the Business Efficiency division.
Johnson Controls comprises several divisions, including Automotive, Power Solutions, and Building Efficiency, and incorporates companies that it acquired over the years. As a result of that growth by acquisition, however, Maltz's division lacked a consistent methodology and processes for managing inventory and replenishment for its various product lines, which include build-to-stock, assemble-to-order, and build-to-order products. What processes were in place were informal, inconsistent, and specific to local organizations.
To rectify the situation, the Building Efficiency division implemented a two-tiered approach to inventory management. It exerts centralized control over strategic inventory issues, including sales and operations planning, management policies, and development of standards and procedures. But the division leaves tactical inventory processes, including purchasing and implementation of corporate directives, in the hands of local managers.
The division also simplified inventory data collection and decision making by using forecasting software that sits on top of multiple enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. The software brings together sales, marketing, and operational information from all of the component groups and produces forecasts at both the stock-keeping unit (SKU) and product-family levels. It also provides inventory visibility for both domestic and international DCs—information Johnson Controls did not have before. In short, Maltz said, applying standard procedures and a flexible, scalable software program allowed his organization to gain a realistic view of a complex distribution and sourcing structure for the first time.
For more DC Velocity, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
Related Articles
- Warehouse software now includes WERC benchmark metrics – Next View Software has integrated the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC) Benchmark Metrics into its Warehouse Management and Productivity solutions. (February 3, 2010)
- Does your software need a tune-up? – Spiraling costs and order fulfillment delays may be signs that your supply chain software needs some attention. (January 18, 2010)
- Software developer working on "crystal ball for rates" – Transportation technology company says new model predicts truckload rates by lane a month out. (January 15, 2010)
- What your WMS vendor doesn't want you to know – When it comes to providing support for warehouse management software, third-party maintenance firms can offer an attractive, low-cost alternative to vendors. (December 21, 2009)
- RedPrairie to go public – Supply chain management software and systems specialist announces plans for an initial public offering. (December 3, 2009)
Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear from you. DC VELOCITY is committed to accuracy and clarity in the delivery of important and useful logistics and supply chain news and information. If you find anything in DC VELOCITY you feel is inaccurate or warrants further explanation, please ?Subject=Feedback - : Simplicity beats complexity in managing inventory">contact Editorial Director Peter Bradley. All comments are eligible for publication in the letters section of DC VELOCITY magazine. Please include you name and the name of the company or organization your work for.


